Month: July 2019

  • Patriotism

    I want to use this post to bookmark a thought, a comment I made over at Wonkette, in the discussion about Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness. It started with Dok Zoom’s quote from the book:

    “Le Guin also has her characters wrestle with patriotism, a very contemporary issue for a novel written mostly in 1968, that year of American insanity — just as our nation is going insane today, albeit in different ways. Before he’s sent into exile, Estraven asks Genly if he knows what patriotism is:

    “No,” I said, shaken by the force of that intense personality suddenly turning itself wholly upon me. “I don’t think I do. If by patriotism you don’t mean the love of one’s homeland, for that I do know.”

    “No, I don’t mean love, when I say patriotism. I mean fear. The fear of the other. And its expressions are political, not poetical: hate, rivalry, aggression. It grows in us, that fear. It grows in us year by year. We’ve followed our road too far. And you, who come from a world that outgrew nations centuries ago, who hardly know what I’m talking about, who show us the new road—” He broke off. After a while he went on, in control again, cool and polite: “It’s because of fear that I refuse to urge your cause with the king, now. But not fear for myself, Mr. Ai. I’m not acting patriotically. There are, after all, other nations on Gethen.”

    (Wonkette: Ice, Ice, Baby: Ursula Le Guin’s ‘Left Hand Of Darkness’ )

    So, that theme did not really get much response in the comments (as if they’d actually let us comment over there /s). But left me pondering, in that way we have when our thoughts are still a bit muddled. In fact, that’s why I was hoping it would come up in the discussion among us readers, I wanted to unmuddle my thoughts.

    So I spat this out about three hours after the previous comment, and want to keep thinking about it. In my many readings of the book, I have thought about Estraven and his loyalty to his fellow Gethenians, and their place in the greater universe, a broader loyalty than to either Karhide or its Kings, or to Orgoreyn. I had just never really taken in the paragraph that Dok quoted.

    Not sure how many of us are coming back here to read and perhaps post, but I did kind of want to talk about the patriotism thing. I’m not sure where to start, but Estraven’s thought on patriotism of course crossed over into my own reactions. Sometimes I feel very patriotic, in the sense of loving my place, my people, and I can get very damn teary about the preamble of the Constitution, or the Declaration of Independence. It’s quite specific to the history of the American revolution, to the Enlightenment, and a particular interpretation of that history. I sucked it up when I was young, and it’s still at work within me. My early, and current fascination isn’t with the Revolutionary War history; it’s the development of the idea, the American Experiment, with which we are still experimenting.

    And it doesn’t feel like the “blood and soil” type of patriotism that the right wing promotes, in name or or by implication. It’s not a “my land, my people above everything else.” My patriotism is tied to ideas, and maybe groups of people, and the history of This Place (or rather, That Place, on the other side of the nation) but not so much to national boundaries. It reaches out to touch the French revolution, the revolutionary movements in Central America, to all movements where people are, as they say, yearning to be free. I know more of my own country’s history; I think that’s why our founding documents stir me, because it has more context for me. Maybe if I knew as much about the French revolution, that one would stir me more too. And then again, maybe what I’m feeling is not patriotism at all.

    The patriotism Estraven speaks of is frightening, based on hate as much as loyalty. His words made me think of blind allegiance, the loyalty of the Trumpers. What I see there seems completely alien, a loyalty that I can not relate to, do not want to relate to. It’s a type of loyalty which cuts out whole swaths of humanity, designating them as Other, as unworthy of rights and respect. And they consider themselves quite patriotic, and me a traitor.

    Yes, maybe what I’m feeling isn’t patriotism after all.

    I got a couple of responses, again hours later, so not the conversation I was hoping, but it will surely happen in other venues.

  • Impeachment

    Impeachment

    I’m on the fence.

    It’s not that Trump doesn’t deserve impeachment – he surely does, simply because he violates the oath of office every day. All his governing, his tweeting, his appointments and priorities are to the benefit of his personal comfort and wealth, not the nation. He violates his Oath in lying constantly about what he’s doing. He violates it by betraying our people in favor of enemies like Putin and Kim Jong-un, and our more unsavory allies like Mohammad bin Salman.

    And all of that’s even before you get to the possible obstruction of justice, emoluments or inappropriate acceptance of help from Russians (and others? there’re probably others *sigh*). Robert Mueller’s hearings before the House Judicial and Intelligence committees happened 3 days ago, and the case against Trump and his minions is, if not more fully explained, is more solidified.

    So.

    To impeach or not to impeach? I know I’m not alone in figuring out how to straddle this fence, and when it’s time to step down to the ground on one side or another.

    The constitution asks us to bring Trump up for impeachment. It compels us to save the Democracy. In the back of my head, the founding Fathers are looking on in horror, begging us to Do The Right Thing.

    And yet we are blocked – at this time – by the Senate, specifically by McConnell. For the House to vote for impeachment is no guarantee of removal from office; it might even make some of the hard core Republicans dig in their heals.

    The conditions of our time demand he be removed as quickly as possible, because Trump is violating laws, upsetting institutions, and gutting both the structure and ideals of our government. Anything that could possibly boost Trump’s likelihood of winning another four years in the White House has to be avoided at all costs. An impeachment process that fizzles could help him more than it hurts him in 2020.

    I’ll note here that for months I have had a strong suspicion that where we see different messaging on impeachment or any other issue coming from different factions within the House, Pelosi is managing that with the precision of a professional dog walker with 12 dogs on the leash.

    I think she’s fostering, rather than trying to damp down the different voices of the Democratic members. The Squad (*flinch*) has strong opinions on Issue A? great, says the Pelosi in my mind: go out there and use your messaging This Way. You other more moderate reps? you employ your messaging in That Way. I truly believe that she encourages different viewpoints, and manages them to attain legislative goals. She is the master strategist, playing 3 dimensional chess more than Obama ever did.

    So, I understand, and support what I think Pelosi is saying when she speaks to building a strong case for impeachment. At this time, there is almost no hope that the Senate would take up a trial. Impeachment in the House can only be helpful, useful, damning if Trump’s crimes are specifically, methodically laid out with irrefutable documentation and testimony supporting it. With that, his removal would be assured by a public that would never vote for him. If enough voters rally for the Democratic nominee, Russian ratfucking of our election process (hopefully?) wouldn’t be able to tip the scales.

    So, for now, I come down on the side of Yes, Impeach! but let Pelosi pace it. I have to assume she knows more about what is going on than I could ever possibly know, and that she’s perfectly suited to managing the three, or five, or eleventy seven ring circus that is the reality of our times.